analysis和writing中大伙儿广泛成绩相对性低一点

二零一五年SAT创作历经改革创新之后，从这三年的学员成绩分数统计分析看来，reading, analysis和writing中大伙儿广泛成绩相对性低一点的便是analysis这一项（这一项是主要是有关reasoning逻辑判断的考察），这也是全世界范畴内SAT创作最广泛的成绩排列状况。

我乃至见过一些英国人教版SAT创作，做为创作教师，考自身的汉语考試，创作成绩也是8/7/8，唯一沒有100分的便是analysis一项。实际上大伙儿无须太过度苛责analysis的成绩，原本创作便是一个主观性学科，SAT创作也是评析性创作，类似我国的阅读题一样，如同我们答语文高考，也一样难以在阅读题上获得100分。

每一个人针对文章内容都是有自身不一样的了解，因此 要是大伙儿在SAT创作analysis上尽量获得相对性的高分数——六分或是7分，再加上别的二项相对性好评分的reading和writing，那麼总体成绩就很开朗了。

依据SAT创作考察方位看来，除开剖析事实论据以外，大家务必也要关心文章阅读作者是怎样“排兵布阵”，机构事实论据，证实论点论据的，也就是要剖析文章阅读的论证方式。

所以说，evidence事实论据处理的是“用哪种来论述”的难题，而reasoning论述处理的则是“怎么使用事实论据证实论点论据”的难题。一篇议论文，假如仅仅好多个事例，数据信息，客观事实等事实论据简易阐述乃至是乱七八糟的列罗得话，那麼阅读者也一样会一头雾水，不明就里，逻辑性错乱，也不会接受到文章内容要想传递的最关键的內容。因此 高品质的议论文一定会选用清楚的并列结构，有效的构造分配，畅顺的行文思路来进行自身的阐述。

有关reasoning一项考察的最粗浅的一部分便是针对文章的结构掌握，普遍的议论文逻辑结构有：

Pattern 1 Definition

(1) add to the definition by offering specific examples;

(2) provide information about history, location, context, or usage;

(3) explain how the term differs from a similar word or phrase;

(4) further define the key term by introducing its antonym, or term opposite in meaning.

Pattern 2 Comparison and Contrast

(1) With the help of comparison, authors can help readers better understand the things being compared. For example, comparing something abstract with something concrete and familiar may help readers easily know the former.

(2) With the help of contrast, authors will be able to emphasize something effectively by putting it in front of its opposite. For example, by putting the beautiful and the ugly, or the good and the evil together, an author can easily convince readers the beauty or kindness of a person.

Pattern 3 Cause and Effect

The process of explaining how an event leads to or produces another is the pattern of cause and effect. In this pattern, if A leads to B, A is called the cause while B the effect. The pattern of cause and effect, when used, helps readers to have a clear understanding of not only what happens or what happens first, but more importantly why something happens, which is essential for knowing about an event.

Pattern 4 Time Order

Writers use the process pattern to tell their readers how something works, happens, or develops.

(1) describe what made a particular span of time eventful or memorable, making people realize the significance or influence of something;

(2) chart the career of an important figure, helping readers to have a better understanding of the person discussed;

(3) explain how some theory, invention, or activity came to be part of culture or history, building a general background for readers or to help them realize the significance of them.

Pattern 5 classifications

In the classification pattern, the order of the supporting details is also not important. However, there is a critical difference between simple listing and classification. Paragraphs relying on the classification pattern always make the same point: They tell the reader how some larger group can be broken down into smaller subgroups, or classes, each with its own defining set of characteristics. The use of classification patterns can help readers to understand easier abstract or complicated concepts, ideas, or events.

有关逻辑判断考察的较为刻骨铭心的一部分便是针对原文章阅读逻辑性写作迈向的考察，因此 除开上边提及的一种相对性简易的reasoning以外，大伙儿假如想在reasoning此项再获得大量成绩得话，就需要对文章内容的语句和语句中间的逻辑性，文章段落和文章段落中间的逻辑性剖析的越细腻越全方位越好。而这一工作能力并不是一朝一夕能练就的，必须大伙儿开展很多的高品质的阅读文章正宗的议论文才可以渐渐地提升 ，这也是reasoning为何难能可贵分的缘故。

此外，我都提议大伙儿在考試的情况下还可以适度的用自身习惯性的标记或是注释的方法开展细腻的标明，那样你能对本文的逻辑性保证一目了然。下边我给大伙儿挑选了一篇文章，另外为大伙儿开展了更细腻的逻辑性剖析，大伙儿能够以这一做为参照。请大伙儿读文的情况下细心感受下边上的大字一部分內容。这就是针对这篇文章阅读最细腻的逻辑判断的剖析。